Why
does the 87th Precinct series still draw readers in, over sixty
years after it began, more than a decade after its creator’s death? Can it boil
down to more than crafty plots, cocksure villains, and cagey dialogue? Plenty
of mystery series offer these; none are the 87th Precinct.
My
theory of the moment: It boils down to investment: Investment on the part of
the author to populate his fictional city of Isola with a vibrant community of
colorful characters. Investment on the part of readers to relate to these characters,
enough so that like the police detectives of the 87th, we are bothered
when some evil is done them.
It’s the sort of investment that lives on even after one reads an 87th Precinct novel not quite up to snuff. In the case of Killer’s Choice, readers are treated to two mysteries, one involving a murder, the other involving the identity of the victim. As a mystery writer, McBain was often a better scene-setter than yarn-spinner. That’s true here:
The girl lay among
the glass and the liquid, lay face downward, her mouth partially opened. The
girl was a redhead. Her eyes seemed too large for her face because they were
bulging in death. The girl had been shot four times in the chest, and her blood
still ran, mingling with the alcohol on the floor.
The
woman, we learn, was Annie Boone, a divorced mother shot four times with a .25-caliber
handgun in the liquor store where she worked. Everyone who knew her, it turns
out, has a different version of Annie to relate when 87th Precinct
detectives question them about her.
One
boyfriend says she was demure and into opera, another remembers her as sexually
available and a regular at his pool hall. Her own mother calls her “not a very
bright girl” unworthy of her more intellectually powerful husband. Then Annie’s
ex tells them everything he did he did for Annie. Her red hair, he says, “set
the pace” for a life lived loud and strong. “The day I lost her was the
blackest day of my life,” he says.
Another reviewer likens this approach to that of the classic film Laura, where Gene Tierney’s title character is described in
different ways by people, mostly male, who knew her. I think this was McBain’s
approach, too, but it doesn’t gel. Indeed, the whole “many-faces-of-Annie”
approach is never adequately resolved, nor does it really connect to the facts
of the murder as revealed at the end.
What McBain does deliver, in fits and starts, is an extended rumination on how a female might alternately conform and rebel in the big city circa the 1950s, a series of observations that, while dated now and frustratingly incongruous in its own setting, do contain moments of recognizable truth.
What McBain does deliver, in fits and starts, is an extended rumination on how a female might alternately conform and rebel in the big city circa the 1950s, a series of observations that, while dated now and frustratingly incongruous in its own setting, do contain moments of recognizable truth.
But
do these philosophical ruminations feed the central mystery? Not really. In
fact, the whole mystery of who murdered Annie takes a back seat after the first
five chapters and never really re-emerges until the last three chapters, when
we get a rushed, unsatisfying resolution.
Evan Hunter, also known as Ed McBain, later in life. Image from https://nevalalee.wordpress.com/2011/12/27/quote-of-the-day-262/mcbain/. |
I was tempted to put a spoiler warning in the last sentence, but McBain doesn’t really seem to want it. We are told the moment Havilland appears that he is about to die, ironically because he tries to be helpful in a moment of fuzzy-headed altruism to someone who just robbed a store. Nailing his killer then becomes the other plot in this novel, a more involving, action-filled one than the Annie story.
Havilland
was the fly in the ointment in the four prior 87th Precinct novels.
He was racist, corrupt, and a “bull,” known for knocking around suspects to
extract confessions. No one else at the stationhouse liked the guy, McBain
writes, and his burial ceremony is handled in bracingly unsentimental fashion:
Roger Havilland
lay in the ground, no longer a part of it. A stone would be erected over his
grave within the next two weeks. Relatives might visit his grave with flowers
annually, and then perhaps the relatives might stop their visits, the flowers
would stop.
Roger Havilland
would never know or care.
The
demise of Havilland marks a clear turning point in the series. McBain in time
would introduce a bad-cop replacement, Andy Parker. There would also be Ollie
Weeks, much later on, a nasty piece of work but with some redeeming qualities. Neither
was Havilland. He was the archetype bad cop of his era, that being the 1950s, all
bluster and brass knucks, but his type of crookedness would have little place
in the series as McBain invested his stationhouse with nobler qualities,
until it became an oasis of decency amid harsher surroundings.
Cotton
Hawes seems designed here as a first step in that process. When we are introduced
to Hawes, McBain makes clear he’s not here to play nice with his fellow cops.
He cuts short a lab technician’s explanation about ballistics and is rather curt
with the main detective in the 87th series, Steve Carella:
Hawes was as sharp
as a plate glass splinter, and as cold as a plate of spumoni.
Hawes
is neither racist nor corrupt. He just wants to do his job and go home. It
gives Killer’s Choice a needed dose
of interoffice tension. How will the other detectives adjust to the new guy,
and vice-versa?
Carella
tries to explain to Hawes the value of listening to others, but it is from visiting the apartment of Havilland’s suspected killer that
Hawes gains something of an epiphany. He does the one thing McBain tells us a
police officer should never do when standing at the doorway of the home of a
suspected armed felon. He knocks.
“Politeness
is something you have to be careful about,” Meyer Meyer, the sagest detective at
the precinct, tells his family later on. Meyer goes on to explain “the best
police department is the one which has hardly any manners at all.”
Several
gunshots later, Hawes is lying injured next to Carella, who was nearly killed
in the fusillade of bullets triggered by Hawes’ “politeness.” Hawes, we learn,
is a transfer from an uptown precinct where murder was a much rarer occurrence.
Hawes will spend the rest of the book trying, within the law, to atone for his
mistake.
This
is really why I think the 87th Precinct endures as a mystery series,
and why Killer’s Choice, though less than
solid in the story department, is a prime example of that deeper sense of
investment overriding any plot concerns. Long after we lose sight of whoever it
is Annie is supposed to be or why she was murdered, we remain interested in
Hawes and how he will find a place on the 87th Precinct team, enough
to want to read the next installment in the series and learn more.
The
book is brimming with personality. Not so much Annie’s many faces, which get
brisk treatment, but other characters who intersect with the investigation,
however tangentially.
My
favorite moment in the book is a little one where an elevator operator (kids,
ask your grandparents) asks detective Bert Kling about the weather outside. It’s
a typically beautiful June day; the poor operator can only envy those who get
to enjoy it:
“Up and down all
day long,” the elevator operator said. “Up and down, but I’m never going any
place. I’m a vertical mole. I’d rather be a subway conductor. Then at least I’d
be a horizontal mole.”
An elevator operator on the job, back in the day. |
Meyer
himself has one of the book’s best lines, when recommending marriage to Kling: “There’s
nothing like marriage for a cop. It gives him a sense of justice. He knows
already what it feels like to be a prisoner, so he doesn’t hurry to make false
arrests.”
Enjoying
the vibe of the 87th Precinct goes a long way to keeping you focused
and turning pages. Killer’s Choice is
a short novel and a fast read. McBain isn’t connecting his plot pieces so well
here, but he knows how to juggle and holds your attention that way.
The
resolution is the weakest part of the book. I don’t want to spoil it, but will
say this is one time I saw the killer coming and was thrown only by the haphazard
reveal. There is a clue involving a vagrant which doesn’t seem like much to go
on, but is explained after as being central to the case. Darned if I know how.
There
is also a bizarre section where the killer calls Annie’s daughter, who proceeds
to relate a verbatim transcript of the conversation. Hard to believe, as the
girl is five and reveals herself more interested in playing with her dolly than
talking to a stranger. But we get a moment-by-moment account through her
retelling that shows her to have a photographic memory.
It’s
a strange lapse in the realism that defines the series, more so because McBain
doesn’t really need it for mystery purposes.
What
McBain did need, and delivered, was a novel that gave his readers more to invest in,
and care about. Killer’s Choice may
not satisfy, but it does engage, which is why readers kept coming back, and
still do.
No comments:
Post a Comment