On Sunday, August 20, 1944, 127 American heavy bombers flew over Upper Silesia in western Poland, dropping 1,336 500-pound high-explosive bombs on synthetic-oil plants fueling Germany’s war against Russia. They left alone another Nazi operation just five miles away, a murder complex at Auschwitz.
A
targeted operation against Auschwitz that day could have saved tens of
thousands, including 15-year-old Anne Frank, arrested in Holland earlier that
same month and transported to Auschwitz in September. Instead, then and later, Americans ignored the opportunity to strike a blow for humanity, particularly
Jews. According to David Wyman, this callousness characterized American
strategy throughout World War II.
“Most likely, it would not have been possible to rescue millions,” Wyman notes in The Abandonment Of The Jews: America And The Holocaust, 1941-1945. “But without impeding the war effort, additional tens of thousands – probably hundreds of thousands – could have been saved.”
With
a title like that, it was impossible for The
Abandonment Of The Jews not to attract controversy in its day, with the
Holocaust still living history for so many. Today, it comes across as overtly
polemical, especially given the fact Americans were fighting a war against Nazi
oppression at the time. But Wyman’s book, however much it strains for effect in
places, tells a powerful story which still resonates today.
There
were many reasons for American slackness in saving the Jews, Wyman writes,
including bureaucracy, lack of clarity about what was going on behind enemy
lines, cost concerns, a commitment to total war, infighting amongst Jews
themselves, and lack of support from British and Russian allies. But underlying
everything else was anti-Semitism.
Sure
Americans fought a long and bloody war against the Third Reich. But they stepped
over several opportunities along the way to rescue Jews in territory about to
be occupied by the Nazis. In addition to not bombing Auschwitz, Americans
declined overtures to bribe enemy leaders or lift the barricade on Hitler’s
Europe just enough to slip in supplies designated for Jewish prisoners.
Wyman
notes how vigorously government leaders blocked attempts at allowing Jewish
refugees to emigrate into the United States:
Between Pearl
Harbor and the end of the war in Europe, approximately 21,000 refugees, most of
them Jewish, entered the United States. That number constituted 10 percent of
the quota places legally available to people from Axis-controlled European
countries in those years. Thus 90 percent of those quotas – nearly 190,000
openings – went unused while the mass murder of European Jewry ran its course.
Jew
hatred ran deep and strong in some quarters of American life. Suspicions were
raised that a president with a Jewish-sounding name like Roosevelt sent others
to war so Jews could profit safely at home.
Wyman
quotes a parody of the Marines’ Hymn, which he notes enjoyed broad popularity on
the home front:
“So it’s onward
into battle,
Let us send the
Christian slobs.
When the war is
done and Victory won,
All us Jews will
have their jobs.”
In
the U. S. State Department, resistance to lifting the refugee quota and
allowing in more Jews was particularly strong. When the U. S. legation in Bern,
Switzerland passed on reports of mass murder against the Jews in
August 1942, State Department officials kept the report buried through autumn.
One high-ranking official, Assistant Secretary of State Breckinridge Long, brazenly
misled Congress about the numbers of Jews refugees taken in and so undercut rescue
efforts.
“The
ugly truth is that anti-Semitism was a definite factor in the bitter opposition
to the President’s request for power to suspend immigration laws for the
duration,” Newsweek would report in
1942.
Such
contemporary reporting about the Jewish refugee situation was, alas, not the
norm. Wyman notes how the mainstream media so ignored evidence of mass
slaughter underway that when Allied troops began liberating concentration camps
within Germany, even the generals were shocked by the carnage they found.
Wyman’s
thesis assumes more could have been done to save Jews than simply winning a
war. Of course, such a point of view came much easier 40 years after the war
had already been won.
When
pressed to support rescue efforts for trapped Jews, Eleanor Roosevelt’s reply
was typical of American liberals: Let’s focus now on winning the war. “War is a
ruthless business,” she wrote in her syndicated column. “It cannot be conducted
along humanitarian lines.”
Not
everyone made the Jewish question as low a priority. In Germany, Hitler was
full-speed ahead on the subject, redirecting railroad traffic, assigning
personnel and resources, and foregoing an acute need for slave labor, all for
the sake of killing as many Jews as quickly as possible.
“To
kill the Jews, the Nazis were willing to weaken their capacity to fight the
war,” Wyman writes. “The United States and its allies, however, were willing to
attempt almost nothing to save them.”
There
is a shrillness, here and in other places, that I felt undercut Wyman’s case.
You feel him pressing at times to justify his book’s inflammatory title. In the
main, his book lays out a convincing case, not of abandonment, but of
diminished concern at a time of dire need.
Some
of the worst examples of Allied callousness involve hypothetical rather than
actual situations. For example, there was a fear among several key Allied
leaders that Hitler might liberate millions of Jews at once, to hobble logistics and free up German resources. Harold Dodds, who led a 1942
Anglo-American conference on Jewish aid in Bermuda, popped the question: “Suppose
he [Hitler] did let 2,000,000 or so Jews out of Europe, what would we do with
them?”
As
far as the British were concerned, one thing not to do with them was put them
in Palestine. Allowing Jewish resettlement in the ancient Jewish homeland was a
no-go zone, and a stumbling block to getting British cooperation in everything else, from dedicating available ships for moving Jewish refugees to facilitating
their evacuation from wavering Axis allies like Bulgaria and Hungary when
opportunities arose.
“I
don’t know how we can blame the Germans for killing them when we are doing
this,” Wyman quotes a U. S. Treasury Department official noting. “The law calls
[it] para-delicto, of equal guilt…”
The
Russians were even worse in this regard, putting their foot down at any
attempts made by Americans to negotiate the fates of Jews with German leaders
like SS commander Heinrich Himmler. They even captured and executed a Swedish
diplomat, Raoul Wallenberg, who had been directing a successful effort, co-managed
with members of the U. S. War Refugee Board [WRB], to save Jews in Hungary.
If
the Americans weren’t the worst of the foot-draggers on their side of the war,
Wyman notes, they did little to raise the bar morally by pressing for greater attention
to the Jewish problem.
Not
all of Wyman’s book is an attack on American policy. He notes the WRB’s record,
while not perfect, was at least significant:
Despite many
difficulties and Germany’s determination to exterminate the Jews, the board
helped save tens of thousands of lives…Their dedication broke America’s
indifference to the destruction of European Jewry, thereby helping to salvage,
in some degree, the nation’s conscience.
There
was also the Treasury Department, leaders of which took on Breckinridge Long
and the State Department and exposed their efforts to soft-pedal the Holocaust.
Jewish leaders, and some Christians like Reinhold Niebuhr and Francis Cardinal
Spellman, urged more action, too.
One
American conspicuous to Wyman by his lack of action was President Franklin
Roosevelt, who avoided pressing matters of Jewish immigration with his
cabinet or his allies.
He stalled for months before forming the WRB, then gave it little attention. Once, Wyman notes, he even left
the White House to avoid meeting a delegation of rabbis on the matter. Enjoying
the support of American Jews no matter what he did, FDR did less than he could.
Even
when rescue policies were attempted, Wyman notes, American Jewish organizations
were often expected to foot the bill. The WRB located Jewish escape routes via
neutral countries like Turkey, Sweden, and Spain, but spent only $547,000 in
government funds facilitating the exodus. The rest came from Jewish groups like the Joint
Distribution Committee [over $15 million], the Orthodox rescue committee Vaad
Hahatzala [$1 million], and the World Jewish Congress [over $300,000].
The
book is at times a catch-basin of complaint; Wyman notes such small beer as schoolyard
taunting and Roosevelt’s failure to single out Jewish victims when denouncing
Nazi war crimes as if they bear equal weight to the gamesmanship at the State
Department. But the essence of the book is a reasonable, well-laid-out examination
of failure to achieve optimal results at a time of gravest crisis. Not a happy
read, but a sobering one.
No comments:
Post a Comment