During
his first seven years as America’s biggest-selling author, Stephen King took
readers into all kinds of forbidden, frightening territory. Haunted hotels,
apocalyptic ruins, teenage hormones, he ran the gamut. In 1982, King ventured
into a dead zone of a different kind: Novellas.
Novellas
are like the walking dead of fiction. Respectable authors with hopes of profit
do anything to avoid them. Weighing in between 10,000-40,000 words, novellas
are too short to interest commercial publishers and too long to fit into magazines.
Too often, they wind up wandering the tenebrous outskirts of literature,
ignored by nearly all.
King
in 1982 challenged this dogma, perhaps the most successful such challenge since
Henry James penned The Turn Of The Screw.
Go figure. James’ novella is a touchstone of American horror fiction. King, the
master of horror fiction, pointedly avoids that genre here. Different Seasons’ title alludes to the
idea that what we get here is King as straight-fiction writer.
Such
an approach invites failure. So what happened? Different Seasons not only sold, it triumphed, topping the New York
Times Fiction Best Seller list that summer and spinning off two beloved films that
made the case for taking King seriously for decades to come.
Throughout
this collection, King signals big ambitions:
The most important
things are the hardest to say, because words diminish them. It’s hard to make
strangers care about the good things in your life.
That’s
from “The Body,” a story about four adolescent boys searching the Maine
backwoods for a dead body. Like the prison story “Rita Hayworth And Shawshank
Redemption,” “The Body” was adapted into a movie, in its case one called Stand By Me which back in 1986 was not
only in theaters but on radios, too, with its reuse of the Ben E. King hit
quoted in the film’s title. “Shawshank” is today the top-ranked film on IMdB.com,
one you would know at once if I was reading this in my Morgan Freeman voice.
The
third novella, “Apt Pupil,” is the most harrowing in the book and closest in
tone to King’s horror fiction, though nothing supernatural goes on here, just a
California boy letting himself be slowly corrupted by an aged concentration-camp
commandant. Rougher around the edges than its more celebrated kin, “Apt Pupil”
at its darkest best retains the power of vicious revelation.
Finally,
there’s “The Breathing Method,” a short story buttressed by a lengthy framing
device. The short story is about a pregnant woman in the 1920s, the framing
device about the strange Manhattan men’s club where her story is told.
“Breathing Method” is the runt of the litter, but the most heartfelt in the way
it consciously addresses the craft of storytelling.
It’s
that craft, and the calling to same, which forms Different Seasons’ overarching theme. An effort is made to link
each story to a particular season (“The Body” is subtitled “Fall From
Innocence;” “Apt Pupil” is “Summer Of Corruption”), but the real connective
tissue is storytelling as a social need and individual obligation.
In
“Rita Hayworth And Shawshank Redemption,” the story is in the form of a
manuscript written by Red, an inmate at Shawshank State Penitentiary who
recalls a long association with fellow convict Andy Dufresne, “the most
self-possessed guy I’ve ever known.” He sees in his friend a story of hope
triumphing amid stone environs:
In spite of the
problems he was having, he was going on with his life. There are thousands who
don’t or won’t or can’t, and plenty of them aren’t in prison, either.
“Shawshank”
is a searing, tightly-wrought tale that feels as much a miracle on the page as
it would become on screen. I’ve written about the movie adaptation, of which I
am an admirer, but there are ways the story works better. For one thing,
atypical for King, it is a quiet tale. Three people die violently in the
film; their story counterparts make more realistic exits. There’s no audience-pleasing
standoff with the guards involving “The Marriage Of Figaro,” or a big
vengeance-delivering finale. The message here is of quiet, enduring patience.
Why
was this a novella? Couldn’t King have stretched it into a novel, or condensed
it into a short story? I don’t think so. “Shawshank” is effective because of
the way it lingers over some things, and speeds over others. It has a flow a
shorter version would have struggled to emulate. At the same time, “Shawshank”
breaks off at just the right moment. The movie is terrific, too, but stretches
the story to offer a more satisfying resolution. Not that I don’t like happy
endings; I just think this one overlooks the importance of hope as virtue in
itself.
“Apt
Pupil,” the second and longest of the stories, opens on Todd Bowden, a perfect
blond specimen of California boyhood, paying a visit on an elderly shut-in.
Very soon, he explains he knows the shut-in is Kurt Dussander, who ran an
extermination camp 30 years before. Todd is a fan of the Holocaust ever since
he got an A on his school report on it. “I really groove on all that
concentration camp stuff,” he explains.
Dussander
calls Todd a monster. This amuses the lad:
“According to the
books I read for my report, you’re the monster, Mr. Dussander. Not me.
You sent them to the ovens, not me. Two thousand a day at Patin before you
came, three thousand after, thirty-five hundred before the Russians came and
made you stop. Himmler called you an efficiency expert and gave you a medal. So
you call me a monster. Oh boy.”
Todd has the perfect threat to keep Dussander in line: “Remember what they did to Eichmann.” This works, for a while.
“Apt
Pupil” is another masterpiece of simple construction. Plot elements are
introduced, established, and discarded in what seems to be the right amount of
time. His focus this time on corruption rather than hope, King develops a grim
suspense story tonally the opposite of the lyrical “Shawshank.” There’s a
steady subtext of contrasting and enmeshing Bowden’s all-American,
value-free-consumerist upbringing to Dussander’s world of sadistic cruelty
which adds a sharp barb to the tale.
I’ve
gone back and forth on the ending, and some of the creative decisions King make
throughout this story. Did he really need that hapless guidance counselor? But
as a novella, it warrants its length, spinning just enough plates to keep you
distracted when King delivers his hardest jabs and sharpest twists.
The
storytelling theme carries on here, too, as Dussander tells Todd (the name means
“Death” in German) about Patin. In our third novella, “The Body,” storytelling
takes on a positive role.
In
terms of construction, “The Body” is nothing like the prior two novellas. Forget
craft; it is as if King picked up a bag filled with objects from his childhood
and dumped them in your lap. The search for the dead body forms the plot, but we
get multiple detours. Our narrator, Gordie Lachance, shares anecdotes and even
a couple of unrelated short stories while taking stock of his upbringing in Castle
Rock, Maine at the dawn of the 1960s:
Everything was
there and around us. We knew exactly who we were and exactly where we were
going. It was grand.
“The
Body” is as rambling as “Shawshank” is tight, but in terms of quality, there’s
precious little to differentiate them. As a reflection on mortality seen
through the sweet, flickering prism of youth, “The Body” is spellbinding, even when
it feels a bit contrived setting up a late-inning conflict with a local gang of
punks.
“The
Breathing Method” was the last piece King wrote for this collection, written
just after his 1980 novel Firestarter.
It seems tailored to capping off this collection with a metaphor on
storytelling. A mysterious, tony men’s club where bookshelves hold mysterious
volumes like Twenty Cases Of
Dismemberment And Their Outcomes Under British Law, is the setting for an
annual Yuletide gathering where an old man tells an unseasonably grim tale.
“IT
IS THE TALE, NOT HE WHO TELLS IT” reads an inscription on a keystone above a
giant fireplace. In this case, it’s a story about a woman whose unmarried
pregnancy binds her to the story’s teller, a doctor who sees the delivery all
the way through to its gory end.
“The
Breathing Method” is a masterpiece of mood but not much of a story. In terms of
pure narrative, it comes off as a bit of a dud. But it does bring us back to
the core theme of the entire book, the thing that binds it together, the
function of storytelling in society. You get that not only from the nature of
the unnamed men’s club, but in the graphic way King describes the act of childbirth
itself, a distending process of creating something from nothing. Maybe it was
just me, but I felt him drawing a connection from dogged but abandoned Sandra
Stansfield in her 1920s cloche hat to his own path as a once-struggling fiction
writer.
King’s
affection for the novella continues: He has written more of them over the
years, including three more published collections: Four Past Midnight (1990), Hearts
In Atlantis (1999), and Full Dark, No
Stars (2010). Novellas remain a hard format to sell, but in Different Seasons King demonstrates why
word count alone shouldn’t dictate the worth of fine fiction. I read them
grateful for the extra breathing room as well as their drive to get to the
point.
No comments:
Post a Comment