One
reason August Strindberg appeals so much to scholars is because he was so many
different people in the course of his life. He’s like getting to study a
half-dozen writers in one.
He
started out composing history plays, became a father of modern drama, an
authority of that oxymoron called theatrical naturalism, and finally a pioneer
of stage expressionism and surrealism.
By
the time we get to The Ghost Sonata, he has reinvented himself again,
this time as the metaphysically-focused developer of what are known as “chamber
plays,” productions performed in a small space by a handful of actors. The
ground he covered was varied and impressive; yet the shape of his work is hard
to gauge.
I
just can’t follow what goes on in this play. Is it me?
JOHANSSON: They’re queer
people here, aren’t they?
BENGTSSON: Ye-es. A bit out
of the ordinary anyhow.
JOHANSSON: Is it to be a
musical party or what?
BENGTSSON: The usual ghost
supper, as we call it. They drink tea and don’t say a word – or else the
Colonel does all the talking. And they crunch their biscuits, all at the same
time. It sounds like rats in an attic.
The single set on which The Ghost Sonata is performed requires much skill to design. This image is taken from the site https://scenicandlighting.com/portfolio_show/the-ghost-sonata/, where the challenge is explained with images, diagrams, even a computer animation. |
Offering
little in the way of actual plot, The Ghost Sonata presents instead a
series of hallucinatory fragments, like Strindberg’s earlier A Dream Play.
This time, the work is less episodic and more focused, but somehow even stranger,
much stranger.
A
Dream Play
employs the concept of a mystical being visiting Earth and interacting with
different people in different ways. That’s out there but graspable. Here, the
people we meet are mortals like us, yet the way they operate and the world they
inhabit is a kind of rambling chaos. The Ghost Sonata has been described as a vision of the afterlife; basically it consists of odd, unfinished sentences and a lot of sitting around.
In
the first scene (of three in this short play), a young student meets an old man
outside a large house where a diverse set of characters are seen to live. The
old man, whom we learn later is named Jacob Hummel, discovers the young man helped
save lives in a building collapse and that his father once had some unhappy
business dealings with Jacob.
Explaining
“I take an interest in human destiny,” Jacob asks the young man accompany
him to an opera and private party. Jacob says he will die soon; the student will
make a worthy heir.
OLD
MAN:
All my life I have taken. Now I have a craving to give – give. But no
one will accept... Become my son. Inherit me while I am still alive. Enjoy life
so that I can watch, at least from a distance.
It
sounds nice. But what’s the real deal? An ominous feeling only grows when the
scene shifts to the party, being held inside the house by a colonel whose
decrepit wife, called “the Mummy,” shuts herself in a closet. A daughter confines
herself in a room bedecked with hyacinths. Hummel reveals himself to be quite
ruthless, making clear everyone is somehow under his spell. Rather anticlimactically,
it turns out not so.
Hummel
is the main character through much of the play, and dominates it right up to
the end. While it’s clear he’s no good, his actual nature is left open. Nothing
is defined in The Ghost Sonata, but much is hinted at. Was Strindberg laying
out the tenets of his newfound religious faith, a melding of Christian and
Buddhist traditions formed around teachings by the 18th century
philosopher Emanuel Swedenborg? Or was he just anticipating Beckett by moving
toward the theater of the absurd?
The
party which centers the play’s middle scene is an odd affair where elderly
people sit in silence, apparently in judgment of their own past sordidness.
This might fall in line with Swedenborg-type theories of reincarnation and
quiet contemplation as a channel to the divine.
At
the core of any religion is the struggle with sin. The old man has not only
sinned a lot, but as a creditor and a bit of a sneak-thief has recourse to ferreting
out the sins of others, which he uses at their expense.
MUMMY: We are miserable
human beings, that we know. We have erred and we have sinned, we like all the
rest. We are not what we seem, because at bottom we are better than ourselves,
since we detest our sins. But when you, Jacob Hummel, with your false name, choose
to sit in judgment over us, you prove yourself worse than us miserable sinners.
For you are not the one you appear to be. You are a thief of human souls.
While
this might read as a spoiler, there really is no suspense in The Ghost
Sonata. Things just unfold, are briefly explained in unsatisfying ways, and
then the scene moves on in a wholly different direction. According to Elizabeth
Sprigge, translator of my version of the play, much of Ghost Sonata’s
inspiration came from Strindberg’s growing commitment to the “merciless
exposure of life’s most shameful secrets.”
In
the play, the Student speaks most directly to this idea, in the third and final
scene. “Sometimes I’m seized with a raging desire to say all I think,” he says.
“But I know the world would go to pieces if one were completely candid.” Born
too soon for Twitter, I suppose.
This
idea might be more compelling if it was carried over through the rest of the
play, a character so fed up with social hypocrisy as to render themselves a
menace. But it only crops up near the end, in a “by-the-way” fashion. The
Ghost Sonata teases out a lot of ideas but doesn’t do much with any of
them, least of all in developing a plot.
If
Hummel is the bad guy, does that make everyone else good? What game is he playing
with the student in the opening scene? Why does he go along so meekly with his
punishment in the second? Why does that woman live in a closet and squawk like
a parrot, only to reveal herself later as an austere holder of philosophical
truth? And what’s with the third scene, which pulls a romance out of its hat
only to cap it off suddenly and unconvincingly with a tragic conclusion?
The
play seems little more than an excuse for Strindberg to sacrifice text for subtext
more than even he normally did, convert characters into symbols, and roundly question
every social norm of the day.
STUDENT: Tell me. Why do
your parents sit in there so silently, not saying a single word?
GIRL: Because they have
nothing to say to each other, and because neither believes what the other says.
This is how my father puts it: What’s the point of talking when neither of us
can fool the other?
STUDENT: What a horrible
thing to hear!
August Strindberg, as painted by Richard Bergh in 1905, two years before The Ghost Sonata's debut and seven years before Strindberg's death. Image from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/August_Strindberg |
Strindberg employed a similar approach in Miss Julie, his best-known play, but at least there he took time out to shape
his characters and story in an interesting way. Here the characters flit on and
off the stage, getting off some choice lines but nothing more.
Most
of these characters exist only to present some abstract idea, rather than
advance a plot point. A cook serves bad food, saving the best to eat herself. For
some reason, her employers can’t fire her. She jeers at them instead.
“Everything
she touches loses its savor,” the student’s third-scene love interest explains.
“It’s as if she sucked with her eyes.”
Other
characters exist to fill out the background, or address some
recondite concerns of the author. There’s the Lady in Black, and her
aristocratic beau. There is a former fiancée of Hummel’s who is but barely acknowledged.
Even
the ghosts are blah. There are two of them, listed in the cast as Milkmaid and
Dead Man. The former has some unsettled business with Hummel back in Hamburg,
while the latter is glimpsed by the student visiting his own funeral.
“You
may be sure he’ll count the wreaths and read the visiting cards,” the old man
explains. “Woe to him who’s missing.”
The
Ghost Sonata
could use more of that kind of humor, or something. What I got instead was more
in the form of a shrug and a yawn. Strindberg plays to his own conventions in
the guise of defying others. If this is how the stage measures progress, I’ll
take Shakespeare.
No comments:
Post a Comment