If only every awful moment in history was as suited for fictionalization as the assassination of John F. Kennedy, with its strange characters, bizarre circumstances, and world-changing events.
Of
course, many – perhaps even a majority – of Americans say that already happened
with an outlandishly false and ridiculous piece of writing called the Warren
Commission Report. In Libra, Don DeLillo dubs the Report “the Joycean
Book of America…the novel in which nothing is left out.”
DeLillo
may not believe the details of the Warren Report and its lone-gunman scenario,
but the Report’s vacuuming up of byzantine and sometimes-contradictory details clearly
infused the creation of Libra, not to mention its title character, known
to history as Lee Harvey Oswald.
Oswald
in Libra is a split personality, twisted narcissist and utopian dreamer,
who in one of his most famous portraits (reproduced on the first-edition dust
jacket) is a half-shadow clutching a rifle and Marxist magazines. After Oswald
defects to the Soviet Union, but before he renounces that defection, a KGB
officer offers his impressions:
Unknowing,
partly knowing, knowing but not saying, the boy had a quality of trailing chaos
behind him, causing disasters without seeing them happen, making riddles of his
life and possibly fools of us all.
Libra presents him as a
very conflicted character. Reading it left me conflicted, too: I admired the
depth of research and how DeLillo chewed into complex themes. But the deeper
the story went, the less I enjoyed it.
This
is one of those postmodern novels that gets foggier as it goes on.
The
story follows Oswald from growing up in the Bronx (in the same neighborhood and
at the same time as DeLillo) through to his last moments on earth, on a
stretcher en route to Dallas’s Parkland Hospital after being shot by Jack Ruby.
Regarding
Oswald’s guilt or innocence, it’s complicated.
Typically,
people who debate what happened in Dallas on November 22, 1963 fall into two
camps: Those who think Kennedy was murdered as part of a large, well-organized
conspiracy which set Oswald up as a patsy; and those who think Oswald acted
alone.
DeLillo
presents what might be called a hybrid. There is a conspiracy, but a rather
haphazard one run by a cabal of disaffected cast-offs. Oswald is part of this
conspiracy, yet stands apart from it, too.
In
an Author’s Note, DeLillo admits to being more interested in a fictional
exploration of themes raised by the Kennedy assassination than developing a
cogent “whodunit” theory. His Oswald is a pawn of destiny, set in motion not by
an evil government but something more mysterious existing somewhere beyond the
realm of reason.
A
CIA analyst named Branch reviews the case from a lonely room decades later to
put it all in context for us:
We
are characters in plots, without the compression and numinous sheen. Our lives,
examined carefully in all their affinities and links, abound with suggestive
meaning, with themes and involute turnings we have not allowed ourselves to see
completely.
Sure,
I guess it can feel like that, looking at one’s journey from any set end point.
But is life ever that preordained?
It
is in Libra. Oswald obeys his many self-destructive tics and quirks,
family heirlooms from his solipsistic mother, Marguerite. Jack Ruby is a proud
Jew and a proud American who can’t stop digging himself into a deeper hole
trying to make clear there is no contradiction there.
Walter
“Win” Everett Jr., a CIA spook sent into disgraced semi-retirement after the
Bay of Pigs disaster, hatches the conspiracy to kill Kennedy, only his idea is
“a spectacular miss” that can be pinned on Fidel Castro. When the plan moves
toward murder, Everett becomes fatalistic: “There is a tendency of plots to
move toward death.”
Everett
is a fictional character; not so David Ferrie, ex-seminarian and airline pilot who
remains a longtime flashpoint of conspiracy theories. Here Ferrie brings Oswald
in on Everett’s plot and tells the young man he has no choice but to see it
through to its bitter, deadly end, even though Oswald has no beef with the
President:
“Think
of two parallel lines. One is the life of Lee H. Oswald. One is the conspiracy
to kill the President. What bridges the space between them? What makes a
connection inevitable? There is a third line. It comes out of dreams, visions,
intuitions, prayers, out of the deepest levels of the self… It has no history
that we can recognize or understand. But it forces a connection. It puts a man
on the path of his destiny.”
At
another point in the book, midway through a seduction attempt, Ferrie gives
Oswald some marijuana and then points out how “hashish” and “assassin” use the
same root word. History’s David Ferrie was more than a bit of a nut; here he’s
a bit of a philosopher, mocking his own appearance as he wears a bad wig to
cover but not hide his alopecia: “God made me a clown, so I clown it up.”
In
this book, subtext matters more than context; preordination more than
willpower. Everyone has their own strings to be pulled, yet there is no clear puppetmaster
at work, only subterranean impulses to obey.
Libra begins in a
subway and ends in an underground garage. What goes on at the surface is never
as important. “There was a world inside the world,” becomes one of Libra’s
many repeated mantras.
If
DeLillo went all the way with a grander conspiracy, or else presented Oswald as
lone nut, the result might have gained clarity and drive. But Libra is
not constructed as a thriller or mystery. DeLillo instead ponders the basic
strangeness of American life in the middle of the 20th century, what
happens when the American dream goes south:
…idealists
of course are unpredictable. They tend to be the ones who turn bitter
overnight, deceived by lies they’ve told themselves.
Oswald
and the others we meet aren’t characters so much as philosophical constructs.
Welcome to postmodernism.
Libra does have its
strengths. DeLillo’s factual grasp of the case is strong enough for him to riff
off of its details effectively, with many call-outs buffs will notice. Deciding
to play ball with the FBI and get them off his back (he is a former defector
now trying to raise a family), Oswald visits 544 Camp Street in New Orleans to
make the acquaintance of private detective Guy Banister, whom the FBI want
Oswald to keep an eye on.
Banister
is in on the conspiracy, provided Kennedy is killed, not merely shot at. He
hates the President for his civil-rights record and his white teeth. Banister’s
equally-racist secretary and mistress, Delphine Roberts, meanwhile makes small
talk with Ferrie:
“Why
do you think a Negro would want to be a communist? Isn’t it enough for them
being colored? Why would they want a communistic tinge added on?”
DeLillo
employs such known figures well; others less so. George de Mohrenschildt
dabbles in espionage and takes a strange interest in Oswald, but his role here
is if anything harder to square than it is in the real record. Clay Shaw, the
only man ever charged for Kennedy’s murder and a key figure in the movie JFK,
released two years after this book, gets but the briefest cameo here.
The
best part of Libra is its beginning. When we first meet Oswald, a
teenager riding a subway, the sound of the metal wheels on the rail are so loud
“he could almost taste it, like a toy you put in your mouth when you are
little.”
Jack
Ruby shows up rather late but makes the biggest impression, scarfing down
Preludins and handing out cards for his sleazy nightclubs.
A
pair of strippers discuss Ruby backstage:
“I
guarantee he will ask these questions. ‘How surprised would you be if someone
told you I’m a queer?’ ‘Do I talk the way a queer might talk if he was trying
to hide it, or what?’”
“What
am I supposed to tell him?” Lynette said.
“Doesn’t
make the slightest little difference. This is just Jack.”
Ruby
gives Libra much of its humor, though less the funny than the sardonic
kind. As the man who shot Oswald, Ruby’s role is a needed point of focus. Yet DeLillo
connects him to the conspiracy only in a very ad-hoc way involving mob loans.
If Oswald’s rationale for his actions here seems strained, Ruby’s is even
harder to understand.
Again,
Libra is not a hypothesis for solving one of history’s great mysteries.
Rather, it is a dark exploration of a different time in American life; its
story concerns are philosophical rather than forensic. The fact it doesn’t work
as a story seems besides the point to DeLillo, who might say the same of life.
But a novel should do more than riff off the factual record; Libra comes
off in the end like a big shrug and a dead end.
No comments:
Post a Comment