If only people behaved in an ethical, upright fashion, bad stuff would never happen.
Right?
Not
so fast. Henry James, a writer whose work was nothing if not concerned with moral
principles, suggests such a thing as overconcern about being good. Take Fleda
Vetch.
The
protagonist of The Spoils Of Poynton is nothing if not virtuous. What
drives Fleda more than anything else is the aesthetic ideal she sees embodied
in her friend Mrs. Gereth’s luxurious estate of Poynton. When Fleda opts
against an action that would place Poynton under her control because it means hurting
someone else, her good intentions wind up ruining everything.
“There
was something in her that would make it a shame to her forever to have owed her
happiness to an interference,” is the way James puts it late in the novel. It
makes a fitting epitaph.
This
is actually not the interpretation you find at Wikipedia. There, in a short
article, Fleda is described as “one of James’ typically sensitive central characters, very scrupulous and thus sometimes victimized by the more decisive if less fastidious people around her.” Technically, that is true, but it misses something I felt after reading
the book, that Fleda, for all her scruples, is the principal author of her own
misery.
Mrs. Gereth would agree.
Mrs. Gereth is the takeaway character in The
Spoils Of Poynton, the most vivid personality and main driver of the plot, trying
to drive Flora to get over herself and save Poynton. That is, Mrs. Gereth’s vision
of Poynton, which she knows Fleda shares. As things stand early in the novel,
Mrs. Gereth’s son, Owen, is about to marry a woman whose conventional tastes the
mother finds supremely disagreeable.
When Mrs. Gereth is told to vacate Poynton so
Owen and his soon-to-be bride can move in, the result of a rather cruel
provision in the late Mr. Gereth’s will, Mrs. Gereth lights upon her new young
friend Fleda. Despite being quite poor, with no prospects of social
advancement, Fleda is the sort of woman Owen likes, and more importantly has
the properly refined sensibilities to look over a place like Poynton.
The alternative is Owen’s choice for bride,
Mona Brigstock, whose simple, garish tastes sharply clash with those Mrs.
Gereth has maintained at Poynton. About Mona, James writes:
She
belonged to the type in which speech is an unaided emission of sound and the
secret of being is impenetrably and incorruptibly kept. Her expression would
probably have been beautiful if she had had one, but whatever she communicated
she communicated, in a manner best known to herself, without signs.
Bits
of humor like that are scattered throughout The Spoils Of Poynton.
Fleda’s name, for one thing. For another, the whole plot revolves around a
woman who wants to ruin her son’s pending marriage because it will upset her
living arrangements.
Owen,
regarded as a blockhead by all, doesn’t get any of this:
It
had lodged itself in that empty chamber that his mother hated the surrender [of Poynton] because
she hated Mona. He didn’t of course understand why she hated Mona, but this
belonged to an order of mysteries that never troubled him: there were lots of
things, especially in people’s minds, that a fellow didn’t understand.
The
Spoils Of Poynton
may be light like that, but it is also serious, with James taking his typical
hard line regarding human endeavor. If you approach Henry James’ fiction as I
do thinking the guy is as lost as a Vulcan when writing about romance, nothing
here will change that.
But
James had a special quality that made him unique in his own day, remembered in
ours, and worthwhile to all: His sensitivity to the architectural complexity of
the human mind.
This
is both a good and bad thing when reading James. On the plus side, you get some
wonderful perceptions on the human condition and the nuances of social conduct
as observed by the upper class at the dawn of the 20th century.
James is a sharp and wry observer; the fineness of his prose alone a thing of
wonder.
On
the other side, you get a lot of stretched-out sequences where much is felt,
less said, and very little happens in the way of forward momentum. This is a
suspense story about preserving a fine old house where tables and tea trays double
as battlefields, and while it is sometimes amusing, it isn’t easy to relate to;
less so once James goes deeper into his characteristic punctilios and
gamesmanship.
Is
Fleda strong enough to resist Mrs. Gereth’s command that she help save Poynton
by redirecting Owen’s affections to herself? Should she?
“The
world is full of cheap gimcracks, in this awful age, and they’re thrust in at
one at every turn. Who would save them for me – I ask you, who would?”
Mrs. Gereth demands of Fleda, who suspects herself of agreeing for the wrong
reasons.
James
makes clear Fleda’s unalloyed affection for Poynton – “There were places much
grander and richer, but there was no such complete work of art, nothing that
would appeal so to those who were really informed.” Mrs. Gereth’s motives are less
pure:
The
truth was simply that all Mrs. Gereth’s scruples were on one side and that her
ruling passion had in a manner despoiled her of her humanity.
The
book turns on a romantic entanglement between Owen and Fleda which failed to
draw this reader in. Passion is expressed, but in a cardboard way without
feeling or desire. Owen is just used to women running his life, and finds in
Fleda someone much kinder in that way than Mona or his mother.
Mrs.
Gereth finally vacates Poynton in a huff, but takes with her all its most
valuable objects to the smaller home she is left with. This is unacceptable to
Mona, who unabashedly wants it all; and also Fleda, who sees denuding Poynton as
a violation like hacking off human limbs. Fleda’s desire to make things right
draw her and Owen closer.
“When
I got into this I didn’t know you, and now that I know you how can I tell you
the difference?” he tells Fleda. “And she’s so different, so ugly and vulgar,
in the light of this squabble. No, like you I’ve never known one.” It is not
clear who is meant by “she”: Mona or his mother?
Fleda
falls hard for Owen, too. James is shy about why. “She had never seen a person
with whom she wished more to be light and easy, to be exceptionally human,” he
writes. Maybe it’s just Poynton she wants. But rest assured however much you
second-guess her, you won’t do half as much of that as Fleda herself.
Mrs.
Gereth is savage on the subject:
“Get
him away from her!”
Fleda
marveled: her companion had in an instant become young again. “Away from Mona?
How in the world – ”
“By
not looking like a fool!” cried Mrs. Gereth very sharply.
And
that is how things play out. Fleda can’t bear the idea of being the cause of a
high-society break-up and ensuing scandal, even with the mother of the guy she
loves not just backing her up but shoving her forward. Watching Mrs. Gereth
swing into action trying to sow dissent between Owen and Mona is amusing and
exhilarating, for the way James gets you rooting for her despite her harsh
manner.
The first appearance of The Spoils Of Poynton was in The Atlantic Monthly beginning in April 1896 under the title of "The Old Things." The series was concluded in this August 1896 issue. |
“Everything
must come from Mona, and if it doesn’t come we’ve said entirely too much. You
must leave me alone – forever.”
By
today’s standards this is more likely to produce smirks than suspense. That a woman
gravitates to such a self-admitted weakling and gives up so much initiative to someone she doesn’t like or respect in
claiming him is definitely not in a
modern way of thinking. I guess it is an open question whether it was James’
way of thinking.
I
think his view is firmer on the question of Poynton itself, an estate which
breathes the upper-class England he loved so much and made his own. “To have
created such a place was dignity enough; when there was a question of defending
it the fiercest attitude was the right one,” he writes, which sounds ironic but
I think is meant sincerely, and doubles back to put Fleda’s lukewarm defense of
it in a harsher light.
Despite
proudly occupying a wholly different time in attitude and sensibility, The
Spoils Of Poynton connected with me, mainly for the amusing but sympathetic
way it treats Fleda’s dilemma as well as the surprisingly warm relationship she
forges with the proud and ruthless Mrs. Gereth. Ambiguity is a feature of many
Henry James stories, and sometimes a detriment. Here I think it works just
fine.
No comments:
Post a Comment