He
played the lead role in one of television’s strangest sitcoms, a farce about
Allied soldiers imprisoned by the Third Reich. A few years later, Bob Crane was
a prisoner himself, of a swinger’s lifestyle that was not only pathetic and ruinous,
but as Robert Graysmith posits in his book The Murder Of Bob Crane,
ultimately fatal.
A
sleeping Crane was bludgeoned to death in a Scottsdale, Arizona apartment one June
morning in 1978. This brought into sharp focus how he had lived, using the
dregs of a once-flourishing career to hook up with all the women he could find.
Suspicion quickly centered on John Henry Carpenter, Crane’s wingman during his
sexcapades, yet the case was circumstantial and the horizon of others with
motives too vast.
“When
you go out like he did, you put yourself in positions where there are very sick
scenes,” Joy Claussen, an actress who was part of Crane’s dinner-theater
show at the time of his killing, tells Graysmith. “When you are that open sexually, you are that
nondiscriminative in the way you pick people, you are liable to find some sick
people.”
Like
Auto Focus, the movie it was made into in 2002, The Murder Of Bob
Crane is explicit but hardly erotic. Celibacy is preferable to living like
this guy did, even minus the brutal end.
Robert
Graysmith is a common starting point for a lot of us true-crime buffs. But usually
it’s that other Graysmith book made into a movie people remember, Zodiac.
I happened upon him through Crane.
Maybe
that’s why I am more positive about Graysmith. Zodiac is a mess of a
book that was made into a great movie. The Murder Of Bob Crane has its
sloppy moments, yet it really hooks you into both the investigation and the
weird sad life that was Crane’s:
After
the failure of a long first marriage and the pain of a second, Crane
obsessively sought someone he could care deeply about. He had come to tally his
own worth by the number of women he slept with each day. Fearful of being
alone, the star had taken to prowling relentlessly, excited more by the chase
than the conquest. It was common for Bob to reject a woman for any subsequent
encounters.
There
is no “whodunit” mystery here, not as far as Graysmith is concerned. It’s
obvious he thinks Carpenter, feeling betrayed by Crane’s apparent unwillingness
to continue their relationship (Crane’s son Bob Jr. suggests his dad was losing
his taste for the “kicks” he got with Carpenter tagging along), had motive, and
it’s hard to argue with the rental car smeared with Type B-blood (which Crane
shared with 10% of the population) Carpenter left behind in Arizona.
But
Scottsdale police, unused to murders, left some loose ends, and there were
other worthy suspects, like angry husbands, freaky girlfriends, and a future
ex-wife (“Hogan” costar Sigrid Valdis) who stood to inherit Crane’s fortune.
Maricopa
County Attorney Charles Hyder decided not to pursue a case against Carpenter. “Detectives
had enough leads for a dozen murders,” he said. Crane left behind a sad life
and a great crime story, which The Murder Of Bob Crane delivers in a
compelling way as equal parts police procedural and morality tale.
Maybe
the moral of the story is not to mess with Nazis. If “Hogan’s Heroes” seems a
freak in the outrage culture of today, it was not so different back then. Maybe
because of the shock value, the show was an instant hit. It lasted six seasons
and remains a beloved syndication staple to this day.
Yes,
the show was about prisoners of war, not concentration camp inmates (one of the
series’ cast members, Robert Clary, survived Buchenwald, while the two main
heavies were played by Hitler refugees.) But there is something unholy about mixing swastikas
and slapstick, and the otherwise-fun show carries a taint that lasts to this
day.
The
Murder Of Bob Crane
goes over some of this by way of developing the victim’s backstory. Before
achieving fame as the face of this odd cultural moment, Crane was a Connecticut
boy who dreamed of being a great drummer like Gene Krupa. He found success
instead as a radio personality, moving to Los Angeles where television
producers noticed his good looks and easy charm.
He
was the personification of ease, off-camera as well as on. He once explained
his philosophy as that of a carefree charmer: “What makes Robert run? If they
get you in a corner – throw a funny line and run!”
At
some point – when exactly seems to depend on who is talking about it – Crane’s
smooth manner and success began to pull him into a different, more dangerous
orbit. He began visiting nightclubs and seeking out casual sex partners.
Sometimes he brought a camera and photographed his encounters for later perusal.
“Bob’s
growing addiction to pornography and the important part this material was
playing in his lifestyle was no secret,” Graysmith writes. It was a case of “a
guy getting away from his roots and all of a sudden being turned loose in that
Hollywood culture,” is how one Los Angeles newsman explains it to Graysmith.
The
book is a time capsule for those of us old enough to remember the 1970s, a
decade when people smoked even at crime scenes and washed-up celebrities worked
dinner theater and quiz shows rather than podcasts and Twitter. In large part
this is why Graysmith’s book works so well: You get soaked in the ambiance of a
long-gone time.
Graysmith
not only charts Crane’s last days in hourly detail, but provides a 3-D floor
plan of the rented apartment where he was murdered. Small details offer big
clues. What were Carpenter’s swim trunks doing in Crane’s place? What clue did
the killer give to his identity by cutting a wire from an almost-inaccessible
location to wrap around the already-dead Crane’s neck?
Graysmith
sucks up case minutiae like a Hoover, but doesn’t synthesize well. He opens
with an episode involving a flat tire that seems to portend much but is left
flapping in the breeze. Too often he seems to be paraphrasing the police
report, with no commentary of his own.
“It
had all the earmarks of a homosexual murder,” one of the investigating officers
tells Graysmith. But we don’t get any real explanation of how this might have
been so, beyond a suggestion the perpetrator might have ejaculated over Crane’s
corpse.
The
more the investigators zero in on Carpenter, the more sure I became that they
missed something. Not that I think Carpenter was innocent; I just can’t see
voting to convict him in a jury.
Graysmith
claims the two men were seen arguing the morning before Crane’s death, but only
offers up one witness to that end, a waitress not clear about what the pair were saying to each other. Crane’s son is clear he regarded
Carpenter as a hanger-on and that his father spoke of cutting ties with his leechy
buddy, but they were still together the night before his death, and according
to Graysmith’s account, Crane would have had to let Carpenter inside his
apartment in order for him to have been murdered the way he was.
I
don’t dismiss the likelihood Carpenter killed Crane. He made a suspicious
rushed exit from his hotel the day Crane’s body was discovered, his rental car
had fresh traces of blood that matched Crane’s type, and he was a pretty scummy
character. But the cops didn’t nail down the case for Carpenter’s guilt.
Neither does Graysmith.
Too
many other people out there had motives for murder. Crane literally lived his sex life as
an open book, travelling with at least one photo album that identified
specific conquests.
Graysmith
explains:
The
entire book contained black-and-white Polaroids of women both with and without
clothes, their names written at the bottom of the pictures. When he showed off
the photos, and he often did, Crane would explain where the women were from and
what sex acts they had performed with him.
Graysmith
even suggests Crane might have surreptitiously filmed his partners while they
had sex. But the then-modern video apparatus Crane used to film them were huge,
making this scenario unlikely.
In
fact, some of the more shocking claims Graysmith throws up, that Crane was into
bondage or underage women, is ironically undercut by Crane’s own kinkiness.
Given how he liked to film his sex, you would expect that some whips and kids
would show up in the police archive. Instead, as Graysmith reports, Crane’s
camera captured standard sex acts between consenting adults.
“He
liked being Bob Crane” is how Graysmith explains it.
Despite
some life dissatisfaction (he was about to be divorced for the second time), it
seems Crane’s plan was to keep on keeping on. After finishing his dinner-theater
run in Scottsdale, he was going on to Austin, Texas where he said the swinging
scene was more open and active.
Crane's grave in Brentwood, California, where he is buried alongside Sigrid Valdis. Image from https://commons.wikimedia.org. |
For
all its vividness, maybe that’s why The Murder Of Bob Crane offers more curiosity
than tragedy. The detritus Crane left behind in his messy bachelor pad – which
Graysmith meticulously inventories – included men’s magazines, bottles of booze
he kept for women he brought over, and videotapes that reflected his crazy life, with his appearances on talk shows and “Hogan’s
Heroes” interspersed with bouts of intercourse.
Murder almost seemed cosmically superfluous; his life was over long before.
No comments:
Post a Comment