Seeking
out an accessible William Faulkner novel is like hunting Bigfoot, except nobody
yet has definitively disproved Bigfoot.
I
haven’t read every Faulkner novel, but all those I have read present varying
degrees of outrageous difficulty. They include this, often touted by lit-buffs
as entry-level Faulkner.
Maybe
so; just don’t call it easy.
The novel tells the intertwined stories of Temple Drake and Horace Benbow. The former is a college student who likes to go out riding with boys in cars, the latter is a lawyer fed up with middle-class conformity. The two find a common fate in Popeye, a sinister hood working on a derelict farm where illegal moonshine is made.
When the farm owner is arrested for murder, Horace takes his case and soon realizes Popeye is the real culprit. He seeks out Temple, a witness Popeye keeps in a Memphis bawdyhouse after raping her.
Rich-girl
Temple spends much time absorbing her new desolate living conditions; so do you
in Faulkner’s hands:
There
was a defunctive odor of irregular food, vaguely alcoholic, and Temple even in
her ignorance seemed to be surrounded by a ghostly promiscuity of intimate
garments, of discreet whispers of flesh stale and oft-assailed and impregnable
beyond each silent door which they passed.
Faulkner
claimed he wrote Sanctuary to stir up a sensation and make himself some
money. Fear of an outcry kept it from being published for a couple of years;
when it finally was it became his first big success.
Apparently
this was less a matter of storycraft than sensationalism. Contemporary critics
expressed horror at the book; according to Wikipedia the resulting tumult cost
Faulkner his troopmaster scarf in the Boy Scouts. But it sold better than his
prior two novels, The Sound And The Fury and As I Lay Dying, so
it won a place in the man’s legacy.
But
is it good? After reading it, I honestly can’t say I liked it much at all. It
has many brilliant passages, enjoyable dialogue, mind-rending descriptions, and
unique character studies of Deep South psychosis at rest and in motion. You
recognize that distinctive voice of Faulkner’s found in better work in its
casual surrealism and the way he plays with time. But as a story it goes
nowhere and takes a long while getting there.
I’m
actually amazed the novel achieved a sensation. Not that what goes on isn’t
scandalous; just that it is hard to understand while it is happening. Take
Temple’s rape, which occurs in a barn:
Moving,
he made no sound at all; the released door yawned and clapped against the jamb,
but it made no sound either; it was as though sound and silence had become
inverted. She could hear silence in a thick rustling as he moved toward her
through it, thrusting it aside, and she began to say Something is going to
happen to me.
What
that something is is never spelled out; partly because it was published in 1931
and partly because it was written by Faulkner.
Opacity
is just part of the problem with Sanctuary; the other big issue is the
awfulness of everyone in it when you do kind of get what is going on. Horace is
well-meaning but ineffectual; like other likable Faulkner characters (Darl Bundren in As I Lay Dying, Quentin Compson in The Sound And The Fury),
he seems built to conform to a modernist-existential sensibility, which makes
him a drag to care about as he continually contemplates the sick joke that is his
life.
Everyone
else we meet are various degrees of depraved. Most obvious in this camp is
Popeye, gradually (and unconvincingly) revealed to be a serial-killing
sociopath. But the rest of the cast is just as twisted.
Lee
Goodwin, the bootlegger on trial for the murder Popeye actually commits, has
murdered in the past, and also abetted the situation which led to Temple’s
rape. Goodwin’s common-law wife Ruby is nursing a sick infant and normally would
elicit our sympathy, except she is quite hateful in the main. When Temple asks
her for help getting away from Goodwin’s farm and Popeye, Ruby rips her for
being an over-privileged wuss:
“Man?
You’ve never seen a real man. You don’t know what it is to be wanted by a real
man. And thank your stars you haven’t and never will, for then you’d find just
what that little putty face is worth, and all the rest of it you think you you
are jealous of when you’re just scared of it. And if he is just man enough to
call you whore, you’ll say Yes Yes and you’ll crawl naked in the dirt and the
mire for him to call you that…”
Temple
herself is a very compelling character in the first half of the book. We see
the aftermath of her rape and abduction, how isolated and emotionally distended
it has made her. But then she undergoes a disappointing character change that turns
her into a villain, too, and in the process makes Sanctuary even more
difficult to follow.
The
action culminates at a trial where Goodwin faces execution if convicted.
Goodwin doesn’t want to testify in his own defense because he’s afraid Popeye
will kill him. Is it just me, or does that seem an exaggerated concern under
the circumstances? Anyway, Goodwin’s also confident the absence of any real evidence
will be enough to exonerate him.
“You’re
not being tried by common sense,” Horace warns him. “You’re being tried by a
jury.”
The
trial then unfolds, but Faulkner doesn’t play it up for drama or tension. The
big reveal occurs with Horace already in the know (“she will have on a black
hat”) but you the reader as usual being kept a few steps behind. Everything
culminates with bogus testimony that closes the case in an abrupt and wholly
unsatisfying way.
The
overall tone of the story is given early on, by a man with a broom outside a
railroad station watching a drunk stumble into a car: “Gret Gawd, white folks.”
After that, Sanctuary becomes a series of character studies of people
continually living beneath their lowest expectations.
It
is depressing, if a little funny. Certainly there are moments of humor,
although never without a hard and bitter edge. Miss Reba is the madam at the
whorehouse where Temple is kept. In between drunken rages she works off by
beating on her terrified dogs, Miss Reba keeps telling Temple what a prize she
has landed in the loathsome Popeye, because he buys her things between the
rapings.
It
is only when Miss Reba learns Popeye is impotent, and uses surrogates to
despoil Temple, that she turns against him:
“Yes,
sir, Minnie said the two of them would be nekkid as two snakes, and Popeye
hanging over the foot of the bed without even his hat off, making a kind of
whinnying sound.”
This
is the stuff that shocked people in 1931, as much as for what it said about
Southerners as about sex. Sanctuary only really works as an extended
lampoon of the American South, with its pretensions of powdered gentility while
a lynch mob moils under the kudzu.
Temple’s
beau in the first half of the novel is shiftless drunk Gowen Stevens, who
styles himself quite an aristocrat for having attended college. “Put a beetle
in alcohol, and you have a scarab; put a Mississippian in alcohol, and you have
a gentleman…” Horace sighs.
The
novel turns on a major coincidence or two: That Gowen and Temple are waylaid at
the same bootlegging establishment where Horace finds himself at the novel’s
start. Gowen is also romancing Horace’s sister, the excruciatingly mean-spirited and aptly-named Narcissa. When Horace decides to take up the
bootlegger’s case, it is without knowing the actual killer is tied up with the
guy who was dating his sister.
Such
coincidences often happen in crime fiction, which Sanctuary kind of is.
There is a crime anyway, and some suspense involving its resolution. The genre
it holds to more definitely is Southern Gothic, but one of grotesque caricature in which humor is waylaid by carnage.
It
is certainly no mystery, except in figuring out what Faulkner is describing at
various points of his surreal narrative:
“And
I was smelling the slain flowers, the delicate dead flowers and tears, and then
I saw her face in the mirror. There was a mirror behind her and another behind
me, and she was watching herself in the one behind me, forgetting about the
other one in which I could see her face, see her watching the back of my head
with pure dissimulation. That’s why nature is ‘she’ and Progress is ‘he’;
nature made the grape arbor, but Progress invented the mirror.”
People
really talk like that in Faulkner novels, less of a problem in The Sound And
The Fury than here, as so many of these characters are uneducated rubes and
proud of it. Ever-angry Popeye even sneers at the idea of Horace carrying a
book in his pocket.
Late
in the novel, when all the action is concluded, Faulkner takes a stab at
humanizing Popeye with a sad backstory involving a father who never loved him
and a grandmother who loved him so much she set fire to him, destroying his genitals.
But by this point everyone has been reduced to human offal that any redemption
seems by the boards.
The
best thing you can say about the male characters in Sanctuary is that
the women in the novel are awful enough to deserve them. Faulkner’s ability to
relate the sordidness of the human condition is on display, but without any of
those compensatory qualities that make him worthwhile.
No comments:
Post a Comment