Reading
William Wordsworth became a most challenging reading assignment. If enjoyment was
my objective, I failed miserably.
He’s
technically brilliant and his words are full of joy. His lyricism, his rhyme
schemes, his ability to effortlessly conjure up scenes of awesome beauty – he
had talent and vision to spare. His short poems feel weirdly effortless in
their genius, their Poe-like flow, and simple eloquence.
And
yet while reading them, and admiring their surface beauty, I often found myself
bored stiff. Something in the nebulousness of his sentiments, the mundanity of
his pastoral settings, the transcendental balderdash, the yawning depths of his
profundities had me tuning out.
The
Child is father of the Man;
And
I could wish my days to be
Bound
each to each by natural piety.
That’s
the ending of the first poem in this old, much-reprinted collection by the
Penguin Poetry Library, entitled “My Heart Leaps Up.” Suggesting cosmic awe from
its opening image of “a rainbow in the sky,” it is verse you often
see quoted, even from Wordsworth himself in another poem in this collection.
William Wordsworth early in his writing career, in a 1798 portrait by Robert Hancock. Image from the National Portrait Gallery at https://www.npg.org.uk/collections. |
But
what exactly does it all mean? I get how a child is the father of a man, taker
of those first steps toward maturity, but how does this connect to the “natural
piety” idea? What is natural piety anyway, and how does one acquire it?
Perhaps
this may help, the opening of his poem “The Daffodils”:
I
wandered lonely as a cloud
That
floats on high o’er vales and hills,
When
all at once I saw a crowd,
A
host, of golden daffodils;
Beside
the lake, beneath the trees,
Fluttering
and dancing in the breeze.
You
might call Wordsworth an English transcendentalist, in the spirit of our Emerson
and Thoreau, except Wordsworth came first. With Wordsworth here and elsewhere,
there is some hint of the “universal eyeball” concept that Emerson famously
floated, a suggestion of physical dislocation while contemplating an all-pervading
but hidden layer of spirituality.
Wordsworth
was different from the American transcendentalists in at least one key respect:
His religion. Wordsworth was a believing Christian, a member of the Church of
England in good standing.
His
poems don’t always toe an orthodox line, asking readers to consider the sermons
of the throstle or the linnet. Or in “The Tables Turned,” one of many times in
this collection he dismisses learning in favor of forest meditation:
One
impulse from a vernal wood
May
teach you more of man,
Of
moral evil and of good,
Then
all the sages can.
Is
this insight going to hit me before or after the cute little critters begin
eating one another? Saying something’s so doesn’t make it so.
This
idealization of nature doesn’t supplant but rather augments Wordsworth’s
promotion of a benevolent deity. “Yet, by the Almighty’s ever-during care,/Her
procreant vigils Nature keeps/Amid the unfathomable deeps…” he muses in “Vernal
Ode.”
All
this carries a comforting vibe, and is quite beautiful, yet it seldom moves
with any force of conviction. At least not with me.
Going
back to “The Daffodils” and that famous opening, I am struck both by the image
of finding oneself soaring disembodied over a field of wind-blown daffodils and
the lack of any meaning beyond that image.
Instead
there is an appreciation of static perfection, of ethereal loveliness that
breathes upon mankind without notice, as in one of his most famous works,
“Lines Composed A Few Miles Above Tintern Abbey:”
Until,
the breath of this corporeal frame
And
even the notion of our human blood
Almost
suspended, we are laid asleep
In
body, and become a living soul:
While
with an eye made quiet by the power
Of
harmony, and the deep power of joy,
We
see into the life of things.
“Tintern
Abbey” was a poem I did like. The question of life after death is a running
theme of the poems featured in this collection. Not alone that way among poets,
but his ruminations on mortality are persistent.
That
emphasis does lend Wordsworth greater substance for me. He faces time and again
that eternal question, and in a way that pulls me in. He’s no lightweight. But
his methods of convincing often center on invocation and repetition, not likely
to pull in anyone already convinced before reading. Wanting something to grasp,
I felt air instead.
The
poems are sublimely well-crafted, though. Reading them, I was aware of an
intrinsic sense of rightness, of connection. His “The World Is Too Much With Us”
is a romantic’s shot across the bow at modernity which connects with this
hidebound hater of the 21st century:
Great
God! I’d rather be
A
Pagan suckled in a creed outworn;
So
might I, standing on this pleasant lea,
Have
glimpse that would make me less forlorn;
Have
sight of Proteus rising from the sea;
Or
hear old Triton blow his wreathèd
horn.
Perhaps
the poems and fragments in this small volume may lean too heavily in one direction,
as the same themes appear over and over. Or maybe Wordsworth had a few core
ideas he harped upon.
Wordsworth
admired one poet above all others, for whom metaphysical questions were also matters
not of conjecture but certainty: John Milton.
Milton
is not a poet who has traveled the centuries well. His cultural imprint hasn’t
changed much since 1978, when Donald Sutherland in Animal House critiqued
him: “He’s a little bit long-winded, he doesn’t translate very well to our
generation, and his jokes are terrible.”
Milton
wrote long, blank-verse poems like “Paradise Lost,” which Wordsworth emulated
with less success. Wordsworth’s three-part exercise in epic blank verse, “The
Recluse,” was left unfinished at his death, more than 50 years after he began
it. What was completed were multiple drafts of the first part, “The Prelude;”
and a completed, published “The Excursion,” the second part.
I
admit I have never given Milton a fair shot, but if “The Prelude” is a taste of
his influence, it will be a while if I ever do:
The
times, too sage, perhaps too proud, have dropped
These
lighter graces; and the rural way
Were
the unluxuriant produce of a life
Intent
on little but substantial needs,
Yet
rich in beauty, beauty that was felt.
The
above is taken from a section of “The Prelude” ponderously subtitled “Retrospect
– Love of Nature leading to Love of Man.” The rest of the poem, at least the
lengthy section that fills much of this volume’s second half, is much windy
rumination as Wordsworth looks back upon his life at various points.
“The
Excursion” is more of the same, but more agreeable to me. There is more of a
story to follow here, about a group of people, named “the Poet,” “the Wanderer,”
“the Recluse,” and “the Pastor” who come together to discuss their varied life
experiences.
Much
of it centers on despondency, a lifetime concern of Wordsworth’s:
One
adequate support
For
the calamities of mortal life
Exists
– one only; an assured belief
That
the procession of our fate, howe’er
Sad
or disturbed, is ordered by a Being
Of
infinite benevolence and power;
Whose
everlasting purposes embrace
All
accidents, converting them to good.
At
least Milton had the Devil to offer color and contrast to his firm Puritan pieties.
Wordsworth has lyricism, beauty, and a keen love of nature to engage you, at
least for a while.
But
what does it all mean? I think I would be easier on Wordsworth if I didn’t find
his vision and philosophy so worthwhile. When he writes of man “trailing clouds
of glory” in his “Ode: Intimations Of Immortality From Recollections Of Early
Childhood,” a part of me wishes he didn’t invoke God so easily, and explained
his reasoning more. I appreciate his stance as a principled contrarian in the
Age of Enlightenment, and his digs at Voltaire, but unlike Samuel Johnson he
doesn’t really explain anything so much as rhapsodize about it. I wanted to be
on his wavelength more. Maybe that’s why he caught me up short.
No comments:
Post a Comment