I have always loved reading. I have never cared for poetry. It is like
spinach or broccoli on my reading plate, except I actually love spinach and
broccoli. May I add I’m not keen on metaphors, either?
With poetry, it comes down to being a born skimmer. I find myself reading at angles, grasping at words like Tarzan swinging from vines, never working line-by-line and seldom methodically. Scansion might as well be a Swedish engineering firm for all I care. For reader as well as composer, poetry demands fine concentration. Ruined perhaps by decades of television, I find such concentration unpleasant.
Add to that I distrust poetry from a bad experience of being dormed with a poet in college, a fellow who would tape his loose-leaf pensées to the rafters of our loft frames. “Either these hang on them, or I do,” was the explanation. That was a tough semester; thank God for “Miami Vice.”
In
college, I couldn’t escape poetry by switching dorms. As an English major, I
had to study it. My favorite poetry-heavy course was “England During The
Enlightenment,” with “The Rape Of The Lock,” John Gay, Joseph Addison, and lots
of clever rhymes. My least favorite: Modern Poetry, with suicide-watch
candidates like my ex-roomie and no rhymes.
Then
there was Irish Literature, and the poet featured in today’s review: the
furiously opaque yet captivatingly lyrical W. B. Yeats:
Come near, that no
more blinded by man’s fate,
I find under the
boughs of love and hate,
In all poor
foolish things that live a day,
Eternal beauty
wandering on her way.
(from “To The Rose Upon The Rood Of Time,” 1892)
Published
fairly early in Yeats’ long career, one marked by frustrated love, civil war,
and bitter artistic feuds, this poem employs simple, poignant images and an
easy-to-follow rhyme scheme. His art evolved over time, but a pleasure aesthetic
and a spiritual yearning often associated with the Celtic identity remained
constants.
In
his introduction to this 1962 collection of 195 poems and two plays Yeats
published during his life, editor M. L. Rosenthal leans heavily on this idea of
Yeats’ accessibility. “William Butler Yeats is the most widely admired, by
common reader and sophisticate alike, of all modern poets who have written in
English,” Rosenthal begins. “Early and late he has the simple, indispensable
gift of enchanting the ear.”
Rosenthal’s
slim volume covers early, late, and inbetween. Through the years, one sees
Yeats as foppish romantic with a lush, descriptive style; a rejected suitor; a defiant
aristocrat; a reshaper of Celtic iconography; a passionate if wary Irish nationalist;
and finally a grand old man of letters employing a sparer style, content to
celebrate life, mourn age, and urge passersby to “cast a cold eye/on life, on
death…”
Yeats
went through many phases. If his work comes across at times as overly
self-referential, well, he led an impressively full, active life.
For
a long time, he worshipped at the altar of a woman, Maud Gonne. Among Irish
muses, she might be more famous even than Harriet Smithson or Nora Barnacle,
but for the inconvenient fact Gonne was born in England. A radical Irish
nationalist nonetheless, Gonne refused Yeats’ marriage proposals numerous times
on the grounds he was neither radical enough for her nor would convert to
Catholicism.
Her
refusal to give her love tore Yeats apart. Gonne was unrepentant:
“You make beautiful poetry out of what you call your
unhappiness and are happy in that. Marriage would be such a dull affair. Poets
should never marry. The world should thank me for not marrying you.”
The
world has, by remembering her as literature’s greatest minx since Cleopatra.
Yeats made his annoyance both clear and beautiful, as with one poem in this
collection, “When You Are Old,” when he calls upon her to recall in time that “one
man loved the pilgrim soul in you.”
And bending down
beside the glowing bars,
Murmur, a little
sadly, how Love fled
And paced upon the
mountains overhead
And hid his face
amid a crowd of stars. (1892)
Rosenthal
makes the point in his introduction that you don’t have to be an Irish nationalist,
or holding a torch for Maud, to appreciate Yeats’ verses in their
service. What his poesy for her lacks in clarity (see for example “The Cap And
Bells”), it more than makes up for in style.
The
real test for this assertion involves the other major woman in Yeats’ literary
life: Isabella Augusta, Lady Gregory. Here you get a good helping of Yeats at
his most recondite and aristocratic, at times insufferably so. See for example “Upon
A House Shaken By The Land Agitation,” his mourning of Lady Gregory’s troubles
at the hands of, as she would have put it, “those who don’t use toothbrushes:”
How should the
world be luckier if this house,
Where passion and
precision have been one
Time out of mind,
became too ruinous
To breed the
listless eye that loves the sun?
Basically,
Yeats’ concern here is with his principal benefactress being discomfited by the
demands of those who were not, like her, landed gentry. Yet this elitist strain
in Yeats was, as Rosenthal points out, a critical taproot for his art. He would
famously inveigh in much the same way, and to better purpose, with lines from one
of his most famous poems, 1920’s “The Second Coming,” inspired by the Irish
Civil War:
The best lack all
conviction, while the worst
Are full of
passionate intensity.
You
don’t have to know Parnell, de Valera, or other Erin luminaries to appreciate
Yeats on Ireland, any more than you need to know what “perne in a gyre” means
to appreciate his later poems like “Sailing To Byzantium” (1927). For Yeats, something
of a zen spiritualist limned with an quirky kind of pre-Christian Celtic mysticism,
eternity moved in gyre-like wheels and to perne was to wind around and between
them:
Consume my heart away;
sick with desire
And fastened to a
dying animal
It knows not what
it is; and gather me
Into the artifice
of eternity.
That
“Sailing To Byzantium” plays with such cosmic abstraction doesn’t make it any
less great; just less easy to agree on why it is great.
At
times, Yeats does make it difficult to enjoy him. He incorporates not only many
classical allusions but made-up characters of his own – with names like Michael
Robartes, Crazy Jane, and Ribh – to express ideas through alternate personas. Rosenthal’s
introduction acknowledges this challenge to some extent: “Yeats sometimes made
the assumption, flattering both to himself and to his readers, that because he
had something intensely felt to say it must somehow be understood.”
Even
Rosenthal waves a white flag with one early poem he includes in this collection,
“Cuchulain’s Fight With The Sea” (1892), which he describes as “well-nigh
unbearable.” Less schooled in the art of appreciating poetry, I could add other
poems to that list, not just other early ones like “He Hears The Cry Of The
Sedge” but more mature efforts like “The Saint And The Hunchback” that deals with
phases of the moon, a favorite metaphor of Yeats for life, or something.
But
Yeats is magnetic when he is on, often the case with this best-of collection.
The subjects follow familiar tangents, such as time’s passage (“When You Are
Old,” “Wild Swans Of Coole,” “Among School Children,”) love and regret (“Down
By The Salley Gardens,” “Young Man’s Song”), and death and the spirit (“Running
To Paradise” “Tom O’Roughley.”) Yeats’ insights on the subjects may not always
be fresh, but his manner of delivery feels like turning over a rock to uncover
creation’s great mechanism beneath.
Contrary
to my expectations for 20th-century verse, complex rhyme schemes are
often observed, lending extra pleasure and a sense of order. “An Image From A
Past Life” is another Maud Gonne poem, written in the wake of Yeats’ marriage to
another woman and connected to a theme of romantic ambiguity. As Rosenthal
notes, you don’t have to know the Gonne back story to appreciate its Poe-like
craft and delicacy of line:
A sweetheart from
another life floats there
As though she had
been forced to linger
From vague
distress
Or arrogant
loveliness,
Merely to loosen
out a tress
Among the starry
eddies of her hair
Upon the paleness
of a finger.
(1920)
There
are times also when his ascents into the higher firmament of his imagination
can be equally intoxicating, as in “The Stolen Child” where dark faeries bid a
young boy leave his family to join them in marshy pools “that scarce can bathe
a star.” It’s a race as to which pulls more at the heart here, the mastery of
expression or the unsettlingly poignant ideas, of familial loss and dreamy adventure,
being expressed.
Yeats
may not be for everyone, contrary to Rosenthal’s contention. But his ability to
plumb recesses of the human experiences, and do so in a way that feels
inherently right even if you don’t quite know what he’s on about, makes him a
struggle worth the having.
No comments:
Post a Comment