World War II was an Allied victory that looks more assured now than it did at the time. Like the Nazi invasion of Russia, you can call the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor a case of colossal overreach, yet it didn’t seem so crazy and reckless going down.
In
fact, for several long months after December 7, 1941, momentum was all on the
side of the Japanese. It’s this aspect of the war, when the Americans and their
allies were in the role of decided underdogs, that Martin Caidin draws upon in this
account of the air war in the Pacific.
Caidin explains his approach in a Preface:
Our story is not one of the ultimate victory we know so well, but of that time when victory belonged to some distant and unknown future, and the present was filled with raw and naked survival against terrible odds.
That
excerpt gives you a fair sense of what to expect from the rest of the book, less by that vague thesis than a tone heavy on modifiers and light on
qualifiers. It’s a manly sort of non-fiction you became accustomed to if, like
me, you spent your early teens devouring installments of the Bantam War Book
series.
Bantam
War Books were often found on spindle racks and the lower shelves of a
bookstore’s history section when I was coming of age in the late 1970s. Often
they had garish covers of men in battle that made for an easy transition from
the war comics I had been reading before.
The
books varied in quality as much as they did in subject. The best of them, as I
remember, brought a human dimension to the unifying theme of the series, “a
world on fire” as the editors called it.
Some
still stick in my mind: To War In A Stringbag, Reach For The Sky,
Horrido!, Sterling’s Desert Raiders, The Coast Watchers,
and Red Duster, White Ensign. My favorite ever may have been my first, Tin
Cans, the story of American destroyers in the Pacific. I still remember the
author making the point that the term “can,” far from disparaging, suggested a
can-do spirit which typified our destroyer crews.
Not
every Bantam War Book was a treasure. This leads me back to The Ragged,
Rugged Warriors, which suffers from many faults, including narrative
sprawl, he-man sensibilities, and an over-reliance on single sources for long
stretches, even entire chapters at a time.
I
found Caidin a chore to read from the opening chapter, which lay on the sort of
gritty prose I must have loved more when I was 12:
He
squeezed a finger, and four heavy guns in the nose and wings of his airplane
coughed and stammered loudly. The small figure in the harness twitched and jerked
in a spasmodic writhing. There was a brief, strawberry-colored spray through
the air, and the guns went silent.
That
scene takes place neither in the Pacific nor World War II. Rather, it is from
the Spanish Civil War, circa 1936, and demonstrates how air combat went from
being a gentlemanly sport to one where enemies were slaughtered after bailing
out of planes (with gory repercussions against POWs which Caidin also describes
in lavish detail.)
Caidin
follows this with four whole chapters on the Sino-Japanese War in China. Some
attention is given here to the role of American advisers sent to help the
Chinese air force, but the narrative is episodic and subjectively told before
being dropped entirely. The warriors promised by the title are still to make an
appearance.
Instead,
there’s more carnage for Caidin to vividly recount, regarding the wanton
strafing of Nanking and other Chinese cities by the Japanese:
Their
concept of combat in the air was a development of the single word attack,
and they had little intention of allowing the Chinese to remain free of their
fighters and bombers so that they could build up their strength.
Caidin
avoids racial or ethnic disparagement here – in fact he pushes hard against the
idea of the Japanese lacking humanity. His aim is more that of giving
comic-book-glutted audience members like my younger self the bread and circuses
they craved.
The
gore quotient is thus set high.
You
might expect the Flying Tigers, a group of American volunteer pilots who
battled the Japanese over China, to put in an appearance, but Caidin makes the
point three different times that this legendary force did not take to the skies
until 13 days after Pearl Harbor. [The Flying Tigers are covered later on, in a
short chapter that deals mostly with the difficulties they had retaining good
pilots in quarters likened by one eyewitness to “an entomologist’s paradise.”]
Then
it’s off to Hawaii, to watch as the Japanese attack Pearl Harbor and give the
Americans a taste of what may have been the best plane for dogfighting yet
invented, the Mitsubishi Zero:
On
almost every occasion when Allied fighters tangled in wild dogfights with the
nimble Mitsubishis, the outcome was decided before the battle – the Japanese
were almost certain to win.
A
clear focus to the book doesn’t emerge until it is half over, after Pearl
Harbor is hit. Suddenly the Americans and their allies must fight for time,
reduced to a few carriers, some second-line ships, and a welter of oddball fighter-plane
models with one thing in common – they don’t stand up to Zeroes.
Caidin
was known for his aviation writing. He knew how to fly and brought that
knowledge to several dozen novels and history books. Here he spends long
intervals explaining how different pilots experienced the sensations of flying
in combat.
Caidin’s
reliance on the outrageous exploits of a handful of American pilots tilted my
B.S. detectors. So did the way they tell their stories, all in the same
laconic, hard-boiled voice that suggests Caidin augmented their quotes
liberally. Caidin never bothers with secondary sources to back up these
anecdotes, or even offers needed context for them.
If
the Zero was so unbeatable in the air, how did Bob Scott or Buzz Wagner manage
to shoot so many of them out of the skies? I don’t doubt they were heroes in
their way, but in a real way, not taking on squadrons single-handed the way
Caidin depicts it, knocking down foes three at a time.
The
heroes-vs.-Zeroes focus also undercuts Caidin’s opening thesis, about Americans
forced into the role of underdogs.
Another
very annoying habit of Caidin’s is excess quotations. He employs long passages
from Bob Scott’s God Is My Co-Pilot, as well as three other World War II
histories Caidin co-wrote, which fill up at least several pages of Ragged,
Rugged Warriors apiece. He also quotes at length from
interviews he conducted with a handful of veterans, all of whom are depicted in
glowing terms.
This
isn’t so bad in itself. The Bantam War Book series often relied on
single-source narratives, and this sort of lived history can be quite
stimulating, however subjective. But Caidin’s tubthumping on their behalf does
grate.
He
introduces us to Walter Krell, “one of the greatest bomber pilots who ever
lived.” Not something I’d dispute after reading about Krell here, who performed
some extraordinary feats over Japanese-held Rabaul in 1942, but Caidin’s overt
boosterism makes Stephen Ambrose seem tame by comparison. Ambrose was
bellicose, especially so as he got older and became more of a brand name, but
at least he worked in multiple sources when praising the American fighting man.
Caidin’s
dramatic license does work to get the blood going. There is an account late in
the book about an attack by a B-26 Marauder bomber against Japanese carriers
during the Battle of Midway which sold me completely in its depiction of the
craziness and horror experienced. No cheap thrills; just honest reportage,
however sourced.
Caidin
also spends valuable time depicting the work of the ground crews, an
underrepresented element in many better books about the air war. In New Guinea,
they slept through the day, which was too hot for runway work; and toiled through the
night, ignoring ravenous mosquitoes.
Bodies
became caked with dirt, hair matted with grease, hands and faces packed with
grime. Cuts and bruises along the body were common because the men used makeshift
tools and often slipped and fell from their precarious working mounts.
The
resourcefulness and bravery of these men is a story that deserved to be told,
and Caidin tells it, but in a way that feels pulled from the pages of some
bygone men’s magazine like Argosy, for which Caidin often wrote. Despite
his opening comments about you needing to appreciate how the tide was turned in
the Pacific, he doesn’t actually follow that up with any strategic or tactical rationales.
Rather, he alternates stories of sacrifice and derring-do that emphasize guts
over reason.
Those
stories register as the only things Caidin wants to relate, again and again, never
mind that these anecdotes fail to cohere in any way other than celebrating the
same few men over and over. Ragged and rugged they certainly were; too bad
their story is told the same way.
No comments:
Post a Comment